|
1. THIS GUIDE
| 1.1 |
THE NATURE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW |
| 1.2 |
STATISTICS |
| 1.3 |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW |
| 1.4 |
REVIEW AND APPEAL |
| 1.5 |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND GOOD GOVERNANCE |
| 1.6 |
ROLE OF THE COURT |
| 1.7 |
GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW: AN OVERVIEW |
|
|
2. IS JUDICIAL REVIEW AVAILABLE
| 2.1 |
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW |
| 2.2 |
PROCEDURAL EXCLUSIVITY |
| 2.3 |
TIMING |
| 2.4 |
SUBJECT MATTER OF CHALLENGE |
| 2.5 |
ALTERNATIVE REMEDY |
| 2.6 |
OUSTER CLAUSE |
| 2.7 |
STANDING OF APPLICANT |
| 2.8 |
HYPOTHETICAL OR ACADEMIC QUESTION |
| 2.9 |
FACTUAL DISPUTES |
| 2.10 |
PREVENTION OF ABUSE |
|
|
3. ILLEGALITY
| 3.1 |
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION |
| 3.2 |
EXERCISE OF DISCRETION |
| 3.3 |
GROUNDS OF ILLEGALITY |
| 3.4 |
ESTOPPEL, WAIVER, CONSENT AND DISCRETION |
|
|
4. IRRATIONALITY
| 4.1 |
WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS |
| 4.2 |
PROPORTIONALITY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS |
|
|
5. PROCEDURAL IMPROPRIETY
| 5.1 |
NATURAL JUSTICE |
| 5.2 |
RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING |
| 5.3 |
RULE AGAINST BIAS, THE REQUIREMENT OF IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE |
| 5.4 |
PROTECTION OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS |
| 5.5 |
EXCLUSION OF NATURAL JUSTICE |
| 5.6 |
DUTY TO GIVE REASONS |
|
|
6. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE
| 6.1 |
THE NATURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE |
| 6.2 |
THE NATURE OF THE BASIC LAW |
| 6.3 |
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE BASIC LAW |
| 6.4 |
THE EFFECT OF INTERPRETATION OF THE BASIC LAW BY SCNPC |
| 6.5 |
PROVISIONS OF THE ICCPR AS APPLIED TO HONG KONG |
| 6.6 |
THE PROPORTIONALITY TEST APPLIED IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES |
| 6.7 |
MARGIN OF DISCRETION |
|
|
7. THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
| 7.1 |
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE |
| 7.2 |
GRANT OF LEAVE |
| 7.3 |
INTERIM RELIEF |
| 7.4 |
FILING SUBSTANTIVE APPLICATION |
| 7.5 |
RESPONDENT AND THE DUTY OF CANDOUR |
| 7.6 |
SUBSTANTIVE HEARING |
| 7.7 |
RELIEF (OTHER THAN DAMAGES) |
| 7.8 |
DAMAGES |
| 7.9 |
COSTS |
| 7.10 |
APPEAL |
| 7.11 |
INTERVENTION |
| 7.12 |
CASE MANAGEMENT |
|
|
8. JUDICIAL REVIEW IN IMMIGRATION CONTEXT (IMMIGRATION MATTERS)
| 8.1 |
OVERVIEW |
| 8.2 |
RIGHT OF ABODE (“ROA”) |
| 8.3 |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS |
| 8.4 |
NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS |
|
|
9. JUDICIAL REVIEW IN LAND, ENVIRONMENTAL, PLANNING AND BUILDING CONTEXT
| 9.1 |
INTRODUCTION |
| 9.2 |
JUDICIAL REVIEW CONCERNING LAND MATTERS |
| 9.3 |
ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES |
| 9.4 |
PLANNING CASES |
| 9.5 |
BUILDING CASES |
|
|
10. OTHER REMEDIES
| 10.1 |
HABEAS CORPUS |
| 10.2 |
PRIVATE LAW ACTIONS FOR DAMAGES |
| 10.3 |
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION |
| 10.4 |
THE OMBUDSMAN |
| 10.5 |
THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONAL DATA |
| 10.6 |
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS BOARD AND OTHER TRIBUNAL AND APPEALS BOARD |
| 10.7 |
INQUIRIES |
| 10.8 |
REMEDIES UNDER THE HONG KONG BILL OF RIGHTS ORDINANCE |
| 10.9 |
EX GRATIA COMPENSATION |
|
| ANNEX I. JUDICIAL REVIEW FLOWCHARTS |
| ANNEX II. QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF AS A DECISION-MAKER |
| ANNEX III. GLOSSARY |