Arbitral awards made in Hong Kong can be enforced in all State parties to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
The Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) (“the Ordinance”) came into effect in June 2011 with the following salient features:
The Ordinance has been amended over the years to ensure that Hong Kong’s arbitration law stays abreast of international developments and maintain Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a leading international arbitration centre. Recent major amendments are set out below:
To provide for a mechanism on reciprocal recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, the HKSAR has respectively entered into arrangements with the Mainland and the Macao SAR in 1999 and 2013, namely:
The Supplemental Arrangement Concerning Mutual Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between the Mainland and the HKSAR was signed between the HKSAR Government and the Supreme People’s Court on 27 November 2020 and fully implemented on 19 May 2021 to further refine the Enforcement Arrangement in line with the practice of international arbitration.
To commemorate the 20th anniversary of the implementation of the Enforcement Arrangement, the Supreme People’s Court and the Department of Justice have jointly published a “Compendium of Notable Cases relating to the Arrangement Concerning Mutual Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between the Mainland and the HKSAR” in December 2020.
Under the Arrangement Concerning Mutual Assistance in Court-ordered Interim Measures in Aid of Arbitral Proceedings by the Courts of the Mainland and of the HKSAR (“Interim Measures Arrangement”) signed on 2 April 2019, Hong Kong has become the first jurisdiction outside the Mainland where, as a seat of arbitration, parties to arbitral proceedings administered by designated arbitral institutions may apply to the Mainland courts for interim measures, including property preservation, evidence preservation and conduct preservation.
For more information, please see:
Over the last ten years, there has been an increasing number of reputable international legal and dispute resolution institutions setting up offices in Hong Kong, reinforcing our position as a leading international arbitration centre in the Asia Pacific region:
For other law-related organisations housed in the Hong Kong Legal Hub, please visit the Legal Hub’s website.
In October 2024, the Department of Justice has established the Expert Advisory Group on Legal and Dispute Resolution Services (“EAG”) to advise on the promotion and development of the legal and dispute resolution services of Hong Kong. The EAG subsumes, inter alia, the functions of the Advisory Committee on Promotion of Arbitration after the expiry of its term in March 2024. For details of the EAG, please click here.
To further promote Hong Kong as a leading centre for international arbitration services in the Asia-Pacific region, in 2014, the Secretary for Justice set up an Advisory Committee on Promotion of Arbitration, comprising representatives from the DoJ and the legal, arbitration and relevant sectors in Hong Kong. Overseas arbitration experts may also be appointed from time to time to assist in the work of the Advisory Committee either generally or on specific issues.
The Advisory Body, appointed pursuant to section 98X(1) of Part 10A of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609), is responsible for monitoring and reviewing the operation of the provisions on third party funding of arbitration and mediation, and the Code of Practice for Third Party Funding of Arbitration.
The Advisory Body, appointed pursuant to section 98ZT(1) of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609), is responsible for monitoring and reviewing the operation of the provisions on outcome related fee structures for arbitration and exercising the power under section 98ZM of the Arbitration Ordinance.
The Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) (“the Ordinance”) expressly allows the use of third party funding of arbitration (“TPFA”) and ORFSA in addition to the traditional fee arrangements. For more information on amendments to the Ordinance, please refer to the tab “Comprehensive Legislative Framework on Arbitration” above.
To assist arbitration users in understanding how the new ORFSA regime operates, the Department of Justice has published several legal guides and tools available on this page, including (I) the Leaflet on “Funding Options for Arbitration in Hong Kong”, (II) Guidance Note and Checklists for ORFSA, and (III) Top 20 FAQs on ORFSA.
This leaflet provides an overview on the diversified financing arrangements, including ORFSA and TPFA, available for the conduct of arbitration in Hong Kong, as well as the benefits and key features of these financing arrangements.
The guidance note provides practical and user-friendly information on the essential features of the ORFSA regime to assist arbitration users who wish to enter into ORFSA agreements. The flowchart provides an overview of the ORFSA process, and the checklists serve as quick and concise tools for users to ensure that their ORFSA agreements to be entered into are valid and enforceable as required under the relevant legislation.
The FAQs provide quick answers to common questions on the ORFSA regime, with illustrative examples on the calculation of legal fees and costs for the three types of ORFSA agreements.
Q1. What are outcome related fee structures (“ORFS”) agreements for arbitration?
Q2. In what types of proceedings can ORFS be adopted?
Q3: What is a conditional fee agreement (“CFA”) for arbitration?
Q4: How are legal fees calculated in a CFA?
Q5: What is a damages-based agreement (“DBA”) for arbitration?
Q6: How is financial benefit in a DBA determined?
Q7: What is a hybrid damages-based agreement (“Hybrid DBA”) for arbitration?
Q10: What must be stated in the ORFS agreement?
Q12: Can barristers enter into ORFS agreements directly with a client?
Q14: How are disbursements paid in an ORFS agreement?
Q15: Can a party terminate an ORFS agreement before conclusion of the matter?
Q16: Upon early termination of an ORFS agreement, how are outstanding legal fees calculated?
Q17: Is there any obligation to disclose the existence of an ORFS agreement for arbitration?
Q18: Is there any obligation to disclose early termination of an ORFS agreement for arbitration?
Illustrative Examples of CFA, DBA and Hybrid DBA
| A1: | An ORFS agreement is any of the following agreements made between a client and a lawyer of the client—
|
||||||
| Under the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609), three types of ORFS agreement for arbitration are allowed in Hong Kong. In general, an ORFS agreement provides additional flexible funding options, on top of conventional fee arrangements payable irrespective of outcome, for the client and his/her/its lawyer to agree on the fee arrangements based on the outcome of the matter. | |||||||
| (See: Section 98ZB of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A2: | ORFS applies to arbitral proceedings and related court and mediation proceedings. This includes any Hong Kong court proceedings under the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609), e.g. applications for Court-ordered interim measures in relation to arbitral proceedings and applications to set aside or enforce an arbitral award. |
| However, an ORFS agreement for arbitration is void and unenforceable to the extent that it relates to a personal injuries claim. | |
| (See: Sections 98ZA and 98ZL of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A3: | In a CFA, the lawyer will be paid a success fee for the matter only in the event of a successful outcome for the client in the matter. Typically, parties to a CFA agree to a “No-Win, No-Fee” or “No-Win, Low-Fee” arrangement in negotiations between the client and the lawyer. |
| Under a CFA, the client and his/her/its lawyer must agree what constitutes a “successful outcome” of the matter, which must be expressly stated in the agreement. | |
| (See: Section 98ZC of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) and Rule 4(1)(c)(i) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D); See: Illustrative example of a CFA) |
| A4: | The success fee is a payment calculated by reference to a benchmark fee. The benchmark fee is the fee that the lawyer would have charged the client if no ORFS agreement had been made for the matter. CFAs are typically in the form of “No-Win, No-Fee” or “No-Win, Low-Fee” arrangements. |
| The uplift element (i.e. the difference between the benchmark fee and the total fee payable in the event of a successful outcome) must not exceed 100% of the benchmark fee. | |
| (See: Section 98ZC of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) and Rule 4 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D); See: Illustrative example of a CFA) |
| A5: | In a DBA, the lawyer agrees with the client to receive payment for the matter only in the event the client obtains a financial benefit in the matter. The payment is known as a DBA Payment. It may be agreed that the client must settle disbursements, costs and fees of non-lawyers (see Q14). The DBA Payment is calculated by reference to the financial benefit that is obtained by the client in the matter. The agreement must state the financial benefit and the basis for calculating the DBA Payment. DBA is a form of “No-Win, No-Fee” arrangement. |
| In respect of DBAs, Hong Kong law adopts the "success fee model”, meaning that the lawyer also receives any costs which are recoverable from other parties in the matter. | |
| (See: Section 98ZD of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A6: | Financial benefit means any money or money’s worth, but does not include (i) any sum awarded in respect of a lawyer’s costs; and (ii) any sum awarded in respect of expenses. It has a very wide definition and can be applied flexibly by the client and the lawyer. |
| The DBA Payment must not exceed 50% of the financial benefit obtained by the client, which – in accordance with the “success fee model” (see Q5) is payable in addition to any costs recoverable from other parties in the matter. | |
| (See: Section 98ZA of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) and Rule 5(a) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D); See: Illustrative example of a DBA |
| A7: | In a Hybrid DBA, the lawyer will be paid for the matter— (a) in the event the client obtains a financial benefit in the matter—a payment calculated by reference to the financial benefit (DBA Payment); and (b) in any event—a fee, which may or may not be calculated at a discount, for the legal services rendered by the lawyer for the client during the course of the matter. |
| Unlike a pure DBA, the lawyer may still get paid for part of the legal services rendered during the course of the matter even if the client fails to obtain any financial benefit in that matter. | |
| Under a Hybrid DBA, if a client ultimately does not obtain a financial benefit in the matter, the client is not required to pay his/her/its lawyer more than 50% of the irrecoverable costs, where “irrecoverable costs” means any portion of the lawyer's benchmark fee that is not recoverable from any other party to the arbitration. This may mean that the lawyer has to repay to his/her client some of the fees which have been paid during the lifetime of the matter. | |
| In the event the client does obtain a financial benefit, but the resulting DBA Payment (see Q5) is less than 50% of the irrecoverable costs that would have been payable in the event of no financial benefit (“capped amount”), the lawyer may elect to retain such capped amount instead. The rationale is to address the anomalous situation where a lawyer entering into a Hybrid DBA with the client may recover more fees if the client receives no financial benefit from its claim than if the client receives only a low amount of financial benefit. | |
| (See: Section 98ZE of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) and Rule 6 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D); See: Illustrative example of a Hybrid DBA) |
| A8: | Yes. It is possible for a client to enter into two or more DBAs and/or Hybrid DBAs with reference to the same financial benefit in the matter. However, the aggregate sum of the DBA Payments to be paid under all DBAs and/or Hybrid DBAs subsisting at any given time must not exceed 50% of the same financial benefit. |
| (See: Rule 7 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) |
| A9: | Yes. Offshore lawyers participating in Hong Kong-seated arbitrations will be subject to the ORFS regime for arbitration in Hong Kong. An offshore lawyer is also subject to any relevant regulations of the jurisdiction in which he/she is qualified to practise. |
| (See: Section 98ZI of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A10: | An ORFS agreement (CFA, DBA or Hybrid DBA) must be in writing and signed by the lawyer and the client. It must:- |
|
|
| (See: Rule 3 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) | |
| In addition to the above general requirements that are applicable to all three types of ORFS agreements, the following information for specific types of ORFS must be included in the agreement accordingly:- | |
CFA
|
|
| An ORFS agreement will only be valid and enforceable if it meets all of the above requirements. Parties to the ORFS agreement may also include a dispute resolution clause in the agreement to determine how disputes relating to the agreement are to be resolved. | |
| (See: Section 98ZK of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)), and Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) |
| A11: | Before entering into an ORFS agreement, the lawyer must provide all of the following information to the client in clear and accessible language:- |
|
|
| Before entering into an ORFS agreement with his/her client, the lawyer must ensure that the client signs and dates an acknowledgment that he/she/it has received and understood the above information. | |
| (See: Rule 8 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) |
| A12: | With effect from 16 December 2022, the Hong Kong Bar Association’s Code of Conduct has been revised allowing barristers to negotiate, enter into and accept a brief or instruction to provide legal services under an ORFS agreement for arbitration directly with a client. |
| (See: Paragraph 13A.3 of the Hong Kong Bar Association’s Code of Conduct) |
| A13: | An ORFS agreement (CFA, DBA or Hybrid DBA) must state the circumstances in which the lawyer’s fees and expenses, or any part of them, are payable. The client and his/her/its lawyer should agree on this aspect in a clear and unambiguous manner. |
| For a DBA or Hybrid DBA, it is a specific condition to state when the DBA Payment (see Q10 above on DBA Payment) becomes payable by the client to the lawyer. The client and his/her/its lawyer can agree that the DBA Payment is due, and is payable, as soon as the arbitration award or order is issued, i.e. if the award or order provides an outcome (and contains relief) which the client and his/her/its lawyer have agreed in their agreement constitutes a "financial benefit" to the client. | |
| (See: Rules 3(b)(ii) and 5(b)(iii) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D) and definitions of "financial benefit" and "money or money's worth" in Section 98ZA of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A14: | An ORFS agreement must state whether disbursements, including barristers’ fees, are to be paid by the client irrespective of the outcome of the matter. The client and his/her/its lawyer are free to negotiate and agree on this term. |
| (See: Rule 3(b)(v) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) |
| A15: | An ORFS agreement must expressly state that the client may terminate the agreement by written notice without incurring liability during the cooling-off period of not less than 7 days after the date of the making of the agreement. |
| (See: Rule 3(b)(iv) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) | |
| The agreement must also state the grounds on which the agreement may be terminated before the conclusion of the matter by either the client and/or the lawyer, subject to negotiation and as agreed by them. | |
| (See: Rule 3(b)(vi) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) | |
| Either party may terminate the agreement if that party reasonably believes that the other party (i) has committed a material breach of the agreement; or (ii) has behaved, or is behaving, unreasonably. | |
| (See: Rule 9 of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) |
| A16: | The ORFS agreement must state the alternative basis, which may or may not be expressed as an hourly rate, on which the lawyer is to be paid by the client in the event of an early termination. The client and the lawyer are free to negotiate and agree on this alternative basis. |
| (See: Rule 3(b)(vii) of the Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules (Cap. 609D)) |
| A17: | If a lawyer has entered into an ORFS agreement with his client, the lawyer must give written notice to each other party to the arbitration and the arbitration body of – |
| (a) the fact that an ORFS agreement for arbitration has been made; and (b) the name of the client. |
|
| The timing for giving the notice is as follows:- (a) on the commencement of the arbitration if the ORFS agreement for arbitration is made on or before the commencement of the arbitration; or (b) within 15 days after the ORFS agreement for arbitration is made if the arbitration has commenced. |
|
| The precise terms of the agreement need not be disclosed. | |
| (See: Section 98ZQ of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A18: | If the ORFS agreement terminates before the arbitration has ended, the client must give written notice to each other party to the arbitration and the arbitration body of – |
| (a) the fact that the agreement has ended; and (b) the date the agreement ended. |
|
| The notice must be given within 15 days after the ORFS agreement ends. | |
| (See: Section 98ZR of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A19: | Unless the arbitral tribunal is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, the arbitral tribunal may not order the other parties to the arbitration to pay or bear the success fee in a CFA (meaning in this case the uplift above the benchmark fee of the receiving party’s lawyer). |
| (See: Section 98ZU of Part 10B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
| A20: | An arbitral tribunal has wide discretion and may award costs of arbitral proceedings having regard to all relevant circumstances. |
| In an arbitration involving an ORFS agreement, the arbitral tribunal still retains such wide discretion in general but unless it is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, the following costs may not be ordered to be paid by the paying party to the receiving party: | |
|
|
| (See: Sections 74 and 98ZU of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)) |
A lawyer’s benchmark fee is HK$4,000 per hour. He/she may enter into a CFA with a client, where the client being awarded all relief sought is agreed to be the “successful outcome” for the matter. The CFA may be in the form of “No-Win, No-Fee” or “No-Win, Low-Fee” arrangement.
| “No-Win, No-Fee” | “No-Win, Low-Fee” | |
| Successful in obtaining a favourable award | HK$6,000 per hour (The lawyer charges an uplift of 50% from his/her benchmark fee.) |
HK$6,000 per hour (The lawyer charges an uplift of 50% from his/her benchmark fee.) |
| Unsuccessful in obtaining a favourable award | HK$0 (The Lawyer does not receive legal fees.) |
HK$2,000 per hour (The lawyer charges at a 50% discount of his/her benchmark fee.) |
Given the lawyer’s confidence in the merits of the matter, the lawyer enters into a DBA with a client on the basis that he/she will receive 50% of the financial benefit in the form of damages awarded to the client in the matter as the DBA Payment, but will not receive any fees in circumstances where no damages are awarded, i.e. a “No-Win, No-Fee” arrangement.
| DBA Payment | Recoverable costs payable to lawyer | Total fees payable to the lawyer |
| A. Client is awarded damages of HK$50,000 and recoverable costs of HK$7,000 from the other party |
||
| HK$50,000 x 50% = HK$25,000 | HK$7,000 | HK$32,000 (The lawyer will receive both the DBA Payment and the recoverable costs.) |
| B. No damages or recoverable costs awarded to client | ||
| HK$0 | HK$0 | HK$0 (The lawyer will not receive any DBA Payment or recoverable costs.) |
A lawyer’s benchmark fee for the matter is HK$10,000. Given the lawyer’s need for cash flow, he/she enters into a Hybrid DBA with a client and agrees to charge 50% discount on the benchmark fee (i.e. HK$5,000) during the course of the proceedings and to receive 40% of the financial benefit in the form of damages awarded to the client in the matter as the DBA Payment.
| Fees charged during the course of the proceedings | DBA Payment | Recoverable costs payable to lawyer | Total fees payable to the lawyer |
| A. Client is awarded damages of HK$50,000 and recoverable costs of HK$7,000 from the other party |
|||
| HK$5,000 | HK$50,000 x 40% = HK$20,000 | HK$7,000 | HK$27,000 (The lawyer will receive both the DBA Payment and the recoverable costs. As the lawyer is entitled to HK$7,000 as recoverable costs and he has only received HK$5,000 from the client during the course of the proceedings, he should receive an additional HK$2,000 as recoverable costs.) |
| B. No damages or recoverable costs awarded to client | |||
| HK$5,000 | HK$0 | HK$0 | HK$5,000 (The lawyer can only receive the fees paid by the client during the course of the proceedings, which must be capped at 50% of the irrecoverable costs, i.e. 50% of HK$10,000 (“capped amount”).) |
| C. Client is awarded damages of HK$5,000 and recoverable costs of HK$7,000 from the other party |
|||
| HK$5,000 | HK$5,000 x 40% = HK$2,000* | HK$7,000 | HK$12,000 *(As the DBA Payment is less than the capped amount (i.e. HK$5,000) that would have been payable in the event of no financial benefit (scenario B above), the lawyer may elect to retain HK$5,000 instead of the DBA Payment. The lawyer can therefore elect to receive both the capped amount and the recoverable costs.) |
The information provided in the above FAQs does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. All the contents are for general informational purposes only.